SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 1138

HITESH KUMAR SARMA
Mokbul Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. Rahman, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

HITESH KUMAR SARMA, J.

1. This is an application, filed under Section 438 of the Cr.PC. seeking pre-arrest bail of the accused-petitioners, namely, (1) Mokbul Hussain, (2) Abdul Gofur Miah, (3) Mozibar Rahman, (4) Mohoruddin Sk., (5) Nosor Sk., (6) Ajijur Rahman, (7) Anowar Hussain, (8) Kulsum Bibi, and (9) Nur Zahan, in connection with Golakganj PS Case No. 543/2018 registered under Sections 341/427/384/511/34 of the IPC. Heard Mr. A. Rahman, learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as Ms S.H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State of Assam. Perused the petition as well as the annexures furnished therewith. Also perused the case diary produced before the Court.

2. No such material is available in the case diary justifying custodial interrogation of the accused petitioners. The accused petitioners are on interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order dated 23.07.2018, passed in A.B. No.2173 of 2018, and consequent upon obtaining the interim pre-arrest bail, they have appeared before the investigating officer and have got their statements recorded.

3. Since the custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioners is not warranted, the interim


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top