SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 1194

AJIT SINGH, ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
RATUL DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
T. Sk, Adv., R. Phukan, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

A M BUJOR BARUA, J.

1. Heard Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned Additional Advocate General for the appellans in WA No.213/2017 and Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned counsel for the appellant in WA No.129/2017. Also heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel for the respondents.

2. Pursuant to an earlier sale notice dated 29.08.2013, the two Sand Mahals in question, namely, NKD-B-5 Shahpur Mining Contract Area and NKD-B-6 Bandarkhowa Mining Contract Area were settled with one Madhusudan Sutradhar and Khandakar Jiaur Rahman, respectively. Both the settlement holders surrendered their mining contract areas through their respective applications dated 25.11.2014, resulting in a re-sale notice dated 23.12.2014.

3. The present respondents participated in the re-sale process pursuant to notice dated 23.12.2014 and were respectively found to be the highest bidder. But before any settlement could be made in their favour, the Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (P) issued two identical letters dated 15.07.2016 in respect of the two mining contract areas, wherein the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest was requested to put up the two mining contract areas for a re-sale by citing the re




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top