SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 1285

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Bristi Dutta W/o Nikhil Jyoti Borah – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. B. Phukan.
For the Respondent: Ms. A.B. Kayastha.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Ms. D. Borgohain, learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) 8057/2017 and Mr. P.P. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) 1503/2018 as well as Mr. R. Dubey, learned counsel for the authorities of DCB Girl’s College, Jorhat and Mr. S.P. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the Higher Education Department.

2. In WP(C) 8057/2017, the award of marks by the selection committee in the selection process for the post of Assistant Professor of Geology in the College has been assailed on the ground that under the criteria presentation of paper, the respondent No.6 therein (writ petitioner of WP(C) 1503/2018) was given 5 marks, whereas, according to the petitioner, it ought to have been 2 marks. In WP(C) 1503/2018, the marks given to the respondent No.6 therein (writ petitioner in WP(C) 8057/2017) under the criteria teaching experience has been assailed on the ground that for a part of the teaching experience presented by the said respondent, she did not have the required minimum qualification and therefore, the said part of the teaching experience is to be excluded from being considered. As the allegation of both the writ petitioners is as regards the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top