M.R.PATHAK
Chingo – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent
M.R. Pathak, J.
Heard Mr. C. Lalfakzuala, learned counsel for the accused appellant and Mrs. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mizoram for the State respondent.
2. The convicted accused Smt. Chingo, as an appellant, has preferred this Criminal Appeal being aggrieved with the Judgment & Order of conviction dated 29.05.2017 and the order of sentence dated 31.05.2017 passed by learned Special Judge (Additional Sessions Judge, Siaha), Special Court, ND & PS Act, Siaha, Mizoram in S.R. No. 04/2016 (Criminal Trial No. 49/2016) arising out of Siaha Police Station Case No, 46/2016 by which the appellant was convicted under Section 18 (c) of the ND & PS Act, 1985 and sentenced to undergo 3 (three) years of Rigorous Imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 9,000/-, in default of payment of fine, further imprisonment for 3 (three) months, setting of the period of detention already in Judicial Custody in the said case.
3. The prosecution case as it emerges from its First Information Report dated 05.05.2016 (Exhibit P-12) lodged by PW-1 Sh. David H. Lallianhluana, S.I. of Police is that when he along with another S.I. and an A.S.I. of Police and his staff, including
Avtar Singh v. State of Punjab
Gunwantlal v. The State of M.P.
Makhan Singh v. State of Haryana
Manoranjan Singh v. State of Delhi
Nagaraj v. State (2015) 4 SCC 739
State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand
Sujit Biswas v. State of Assam
Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal v. Anil Kumar Bhunja & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.