KALYAN RAI SURANA
YIGO BAM @ MIGO BAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH – Respondent
KALYAN RAI SURANA, J.
1. Heard Mr. R. Saikia, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. G. Ete, the learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the State respondents No. 1 and 3 as well as Mr. K. Jini, the learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 and Mr. T. T. Tara, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4.
2. By this writ petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order No. BSR/LK-176/14-15/Vol.III dated 09.11.2015, passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Basar.
3. In this writ petition it is projected that the ancestral family property was equally divided between two brothers, namely, Lime Bam and Ligo Bam. Ligo Bam, who became the owner of Ampir Jhum land measuring 22,558 sq. meters, was the forefather of the petitioner. The said land falling in the share of Ligo Bam was equally divided amongst his three sons, namely, Gomi Bam, Gokar Bam and Goyi Bam. Goyi Bam (since deceased) is the father of the petitioner and upon his death, the share of Late Goyi Bam was inherited by the petitioner. It is further projected that in the year 1996, the petitioner had allowed the responden
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.