KALYAN RAI SURANA
Subhash Chandra Dey – Appellant
Versus
Mangal Chandra Sarkar – Respondent
Kalyan Rai Surana, J.
Heard Mr. N. Das, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as Mr. A. Biswas, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. By this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 09.12.2014, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Barpeta in Title Execution Case No. 9/2013, thereby rejecting the application filed by the petitioner under section 151 CPC.
3. The petitioner No.1 herein is the defendant No.4 in TS 11/1998 and the petitioner No. 2 herein is the defendant No.3 in the said suit. The suit was instituted by the respondent herein, seeking specific performance of the contract. The following four prayers are made in the plaint:-
(a) That a decree be passed for a specific performance of contract by the defendants ordering the defendants to execute and register a sale deed transferring the suit land in favour of the plaintiff and for delivering khas possession of the suit land in favour of the plaintiff, and.
(b) That alternatively a decree be passed for the refund of the surplus amount of Rs. 214602.00 which the defendants received from the plaintiff and further a sum
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.