Arup Kumar Goswami, J.

Heard Ms. S.P. Hussain, learned Legal Aid Counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Y.S. Mannan, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 4, Mr. M. Rahman, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 3. Mr. R.C. Borpatragohain, learned Advocate General, Assam, who was requested by the Court to address, is also heard. He is assisted by Mr. T.C. Chutia, learned State counsel.

2. This writ petition is filed questioning the process of talak initiated by respondent No. 3 and for directing the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to cancel, recall or otherwise forbear from giving effect to the impugned registration of talak.

3. The respondent No. 2 is the Registrar-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup and respondent No. 3 is the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Registrar, Hatigaon for the district of Kamrup.

4. At the outset, facts relevant for the purpose of this case, as stated in the writ petition, may be, briefly, noticed:

The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent No. 4 was solemnized on 21.03.2015 according to Islamic Shariat at Guwahati. From the beginning of the marital life, the petitioner had been subjected to mental and physical torture