SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 1455

KALYAN RAI SURANA
Sashi Bhushan Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Kumar Nandy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: B. Borah and P. Deka
For the Respondents: P.C. Dey and I. Hoque

JUDGMENT :

KALYAN RAI SURANA, J.

1. Heard Mr. B. Borah, the learned advocate for the petitioner as well as Mr. EC. Dey, the learned advocate for the respondents.

2. By this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 09.02.2016, passed by the learned Special Tribunal, Guwahati, in Special Land Grabbing Case No. 8/2014, which was instituted under Section 8 of the Assam Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2010 (herein after referred to as "the 2010 Act").

3. Both the respondents herein are the petitioners in the said land grabbing case. The petitioner herein is the Opp. Party in the said case. The petitioner herein had filed an application under Section 8(4) of the 2010 Act, inter-alia, praying for the dismissal of the said proceeding. However, by the order dated 21.01.2016, which is impugned herein, the said learned Tribunal had ordered that the said petition would be disposed at the time of final judgment

4. The learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that after the case was instituted, the learned Tribunal by order dated 18.07.2014, had referred the matter to the Circle Officer, Dispur Revenue Circle for inspection and v















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top