SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 57

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, AJIT BORTHAKUR, JJ.
Atabur Rahman - Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Ors. Rep By Min of Home Affairs - Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 8516 of 2018
Decided On : 20-02-2019

Advocates Appeared:
H.R.A. Choudhury, Adv.

Continuous residency in the State of Assam since the date of initial entry is a core requirement for registration of foreigners under Section 6A(3) of the Citizenship Act of 1955.

Headnote:

Citizenship Act - Registration of Foreigners - Section 6A(3)

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was declared a foreigner by the Foreigners Tribunal for not registering himself as per Section 6A(3) of the Citizenship Act of 1955, leading to a situation where he is liable to be deported.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner had not been declared to have continuously resided in the State of Assam since the date of his initial entry between 01.01.1966 and 25.03.1971, and thus allowed the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal for leading appropriate evidence to establish continuous residency.

Issues: The issue revolved around the petitioner's continuous residency in the State of Assam as required under Section 6A(3) of the Citizenship Act of 1955.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the core requirement for registration under Section 6A(3) is continuous residency in the State of Assam since the date of initial entry between 01.01.1966 and 25.03.1971.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the petitioner was directed to appear before the Tribunal for leading evidence of continuous residency.

JUDGMENT :

A.M. BUJOR BARUA, J.

1. Heard Ms. H. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A Ali, learned counsel for the Election Commission of India, Mr. A. Kalita, learned standing counsel for the State of Assam appearing for the Foreigners Tribunal and Border Affairs, Ms. A Verma, learned standing counsel for the authorities under the NRC as well as Ms. G. Sarma, learned counsel for the authorities under the Union of India.

2. The petitioner was referred by the Superintendent of Police (Border), Nagaon resulting in the registration of F.T. Case No.175/2000 before the Foreigners Tribunal, Nagaon. The petitioner upon receipt of notice, entered appearance, but had neither submitted any written statement nor adduced any evidence. In the circumstance, the Tribunal by the order dated 18.06.2008 had declared him to be a foreigner who had entered Assam between 01.01.1966 and 25.03.1971.

3. In spite of the order of the Tribunal, the petitioner did not register himself, resulting in a situation where he is now liable to be deported.

4. The law as regards the registration of a person declared to have entered the State of Assam between 01.01.966 and 25.13.1971 is provided in Section 6A(3) of the Citizenship Act of 1955. Section 6A(3) provides as follows:-

(3) Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (6) and (7), every person of Indian origin who-

(a) came to Assam on or after the 1st day of January, 1966 but before the 25th day of March, 1971 from the specified territory; and

(b) has, since the date of his entry into Assam, been ordinarily resident in Assam; and

(c) has been detected to be a foreigner, shall register himself in accordance with the rules made by the Central Government in this behalf under section 18 with such authority (thereafter in this sub-section referred to as the registering authority) as may be specified in such rules and if his name is included in any electoral roll for any Assembly or Parliamentary constituency in force on the date of such detection, his name shall be deleted there from. Explanation.-In the case of every person seeking registration under this sub-section, the opinion of the Tribunal constituted under the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964 holding such person to be a foreigner, shall be deemed to be sufficient proof of the requirement under clause (c) of this sub-section and if any question arises as to whether such person complies with any other requirement under this sub-section, the registering authority shall,-

(i) if such opinion contains a finding with respect to such other requirement, decide the question in conformity with such finding;

(ii) if such opinion does not contain a finding with respect to such other requirement, refer the question to a Tribunal constituted under the said Order hang jurisdiction in accordance with such rules as the Central Government may make in this behalf under section 18 and decide the question in conformity with the opinion received on such reference.

5. A reading of the provision of Section 6A(3)(b) shows that every person of Indian origin, who came to Assam on or after 01.01.1966, but before 25.03.1971 from the specified territory and has since the date of his/her entry into Assam been ordinarily resident in Assam and has been detected to be a foreigner, shall register himself or herself in accordance with the Rules made by the Central Government for the purpose. A core requirement of being eligible to be registered is that there also has to be a conclusion arrived at that the person concerned, who came after 01.01.1966 but before 25.03.1971 and has been declared to be a foreigner, had mandatorily resided in the State of Assam continuously since the date of his or her entry into Assam. The requirement of being ordinarily a resident in Assam since the date of his/her entry into Assam is a condition precedent for being eligible to be registered under Section 6A(3) of the Citizenship Act of 1955. In the absence of a satisfaction of the condition precedent of bein




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top