SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 86

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, AJIT BORTHAKUR
HAIDAR ALI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
E. Ahmed, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, J.

1. Heard Mr. Z Hammad, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. A Ali, learned counsel for the Election Commission of India, Mr. UK Nair, learned standing counsel for the State of Assam appearing for the Foreigners Tribunal and Border Areas, Ms. U. Das, learned standing counsel for the authorities under the NRC as well as Ms. G Sarma, learned counsel for the authorities under the Union of India.

2. On being referred by the Superintendent of Police (Border), Morigaon, IM(D)T Case No.914/2002 was registered against the petitioners. Upon the IM(D)T Act of 1983 being declared ultra-vires, the reference was transferred to the Foreigners Tribunal No.1, Morigaon and was renumbered as Case No.FT(C) 462/2010.

3. Before the Tribunal, the petitioner No.1 in the written statement had taken a stand that he is the son of late Kismat Ali and was born and brought up in the village Rampur Satra under the Batadrava police station in the Nagaon district. The petitioner No.1 takes a stand that in the police report, his father is shown as Ismat Ali instead of Kismat Ali, but Ismat and Kismat Ali is the same person, who in fact is the son of Abdul Sheikh.















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top