SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 95

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, AJIT BORTHAKUR
UTTAM SAHA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
B.J. Mukherjee, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, J.

1. Heard Mr. SS Sharma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. AI Ali, learned counsel for the Election Commission of India and Mr. J Payeng, learned counsel for the State of Assam appearing for the Foreigners Tribunal and Border Areas, Ms. A Verma, learned standing counsel for the authorities under the NRC as well as Ms. G Sarma, learned counsel for the authorities under the Union of India.

2. On being referred by the authorities, vide PE No.153/99, Case No. BNGN/FT/CHR/1319/08 was registered in the Foreigners' Tribunal, Chirang against the present petitioner. Vide the order dated 12.12.2016, the Tribunal arrived at the conclusion that the father of the petitioner, Naresh Ch. Saha had migrated from the erstwhile East Pakistan in the year 1965 along with his family members and acquired Indian citizenship on 05.02.1979 by registration. It was also concluded in the order that the petitioner who was a minor at that relevant point of time had also migrated to India along with his father.

3. From the said findings arrived at by the Tribunal, logical conclusion should have been that the petitioner had migrated to India prior to 01.







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top