SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Gau) 1585

UJJAL BHUYAN
Rahul HI Rise Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :K. Agarwal, Advocate
For the Respondent:A. Chakraborty, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Ujjal Bhuyan, J.

1. Heard Mr. K. Agarwal, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A. Chakraborty, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam.

2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek quashing of notices dated 28.05.2011 and 20.09.2011 and further seek a direction to the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners pursuant to the aforesaid notices.

3. According to the petitioners, petitioner No. 1 is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Kolkata. Petitioner No. 2 is one of the Directors of petitioner No. 1. Petitioner No. 1 is engaged in construction and infrastructure business.

4. In the month of September, 2011, petitioners received a letter dated 20.09.2011 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Barpeta addressed to the Chairman and Managing Director of petitioner No. 1 stating that a complaint was received against petitioner No. 1 of being involved in cheating and fraud by collecting deposits from the general public of Barpeta district. Notice issue
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top