KALYAN RAI SURANA
Horjum Lollen – Appellant
Versus
Dago Lollen – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. D. Loyi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. K. Lollen, learned counsel for the sole respondent.
2. The brief facts of this revision petition is that pursuant to the directions issued by the learned Deputy Commissioner, West Siang District, Aalo vide an Order bearing No. AR-9/TS “KON GIDA” dated 12.1.2016 held that the Head Gaonburah of village - Kombo Tarsu would arrange a Keba in connection with the dispute between the parties herein, subject to an undertaking by the petitioner before the Deputy Commissioner, Aalo that he would appear before the village authority on the date fixed for hearing. The Keba so organized by an order dated 11.2.2016 upheld the previous Keba order dated 18.11.2015 and affirmed the boundary as demarcated on 18.11.2015. Thereafter, the petitioner by a letter dated 23.2.2016 informed the Head Gam of the village of Kon-Gida that he did not agree with the decision of Keba taken on 19.2.2016 and also informed about the non-acceptance of Keba decision and intimation to file an appeal. This was followed by a letter to the Deputy Commissioner, West Siang District, Aalo under the heading - “Compliant against the village authorit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.