SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 265

A.S.BOPANNA, A.K.GOSWAMI
Dilip Paul – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M Chanda.

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Goswami, J.

1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the judgment and order dated 03.07.2015, passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Guwahati Bench, in an Original Application, being O.A. 181/2013, dismissing the Original Application filed by the petitioner.

2. The petitioner retired on 31.03.2013 as Deputy Inspector General (DIG), Frontier Headquarters, Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB). During the pendency of the writ petition, an order dated 05.01.2016 was passed imposing penalty of withholding of 50% of monthly pension of the petitioner on permanent basis. The penalty so imposed had its roots on a complaint dated 30.08.2011 of sexual harassment made by one Smti. Sunita Singha, Field Assistant (Lady) while the petitioner was serving as Area Organizer, SSB, Rangia. The writ petition was accordingly amended and the said order of penalty was also impugned. Relief is also sought for with regard to the prayers made before the CAT. The petitioner had prayed before the CAT for setting aside and quashing the following:

(i) FAX message dated 03.09.2012 and the constitution of the Central Legal Complaint Committee under the Chairperson of Smti. B. Radhika, IP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top