SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 362

MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Jatin Mali – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sk S.N. Mohammad.

JUDGMENT :

Michael Zothankhuma, J.

1. Heard Mr. Sk. S.N. Mohammad, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Mozumdar, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam.

2. The present matter relates to providing security guards to the petitioner, considering the threat perception against the petitioner.

3. The petitioners counsel submits that the petitioner is a 4 (four) time MLA and was also an Ex-Minister. He submits that the petitioner had initially been given two PSOs and four House Guards while he was a Minister in the Government of Assam. However, after he lost the last Assembly Election in the year 2016, all his PSOs and House Guards were withdrawn. He submits that the withdrawal of the security provided to the petitioner has exposed the petitioner to immense danger to his life and liberty. He also submits that in pursuance to an interim order passed by this Court, the petitioner has now been provided with one PSO. He submits that being a four time MLA and a two time Minister in the Government of Assam, the petitioner is entitled to the earlier security arrangement provided to him.

4. Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned Addl. Advocate General submits that the PSOs and House Guards had been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top