SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 396

A.K.GOSWAMI, MANISH CHOUDHURY
Md Jalal Uddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.J. Ghosh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Manish Choudhury, J.

This intra-court appeal is directed against the common order dated 04.04.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in the writ petition, W.P.(C) No. 6379/2018. By the common order dated 04.04.2019, the learned Single Judge had disposed of two writ petitions, W.P.(C) No. 6379/2018 & W.P.(C) No. 6416/2018. While dismissing the writ petition, W.P.(C) No. 6416/2018, the learned Single Judge had allowed the other writ petition, W.P.(C) No. 6379/2018, by setting aside the settlement order dated 27.07.2018 passed in favour of the appellant herein in respect of Baralimari Bi-Weekly Market under Morigaon district and the Chief Executive Officer, Morigaon Zilla Parishad was directed to settle the market in favour of the respondent No. 6 herein, who was the writ petitioner, by fixing the revenue proportionately in terms of the bid value offered by him i.e. Rs. 1,35,220.00.

2. Heard Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 6. Also heard Mr. M. Nath, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 & 5 and Mr. H.K. Hazarika, learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top