SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 507

NELSON SAILO
Nasima Begum – Appellant
Versus
Keramat Ali – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R.K. Dey.
For the Respondent: Mr. N.N. Bhuyanr-3.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. R. Dev, the learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. A.J. Saikia, the learned counsel for the respondent No.3 and Mr. B.K. Purkayastha, the learned counsel for the respondent No.4. None appears for the remaining respondents.

2. The appellant before this Court was also the claimant before the Tribunal. Being aggrieved with the Judgment & Order dated 09.12.2013, passed by the Addl. District & Session Judge-cum-Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Tribunal), Hojai, Sankardev Nagar in MAC Case No. 181 (N)/2012, he has filed the present appeal.

3. Grounds taken in the appeal is that although the appellant/claimant led evidence that the deceased was earning a sum of Rs. 18,000/- per month and also giving private tuition, the learned Tribunal arbitrarily fixed a notional income of Rs. 3,000/- per month. The deceased was aged 42 years at the time of his death and which was supported by his Driving License but the learned Tribunal accepted 48 years as the age of the deceased on the basis of the post mortem report. Further, despite the fact that the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top