SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 555

A.S.BOPANNA, A.K.GOSWAMI
Tarani Kanta Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S. Dutta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. A. Dasgupta, Senior Advocate, Mr. B. K. Das, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Goswami, J.

We have heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. We have also heard Mr. A. Dasgupta, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. B. K. Das, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. By means of this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who had superannuated on 29.02.2012 while working as a Senior Engineer (IT) in the Information Technology Centre, NF Railway, has called into question the judgment dated 05.06.2014, passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (for short "CAT"), Guwahati, in Original Application No. 50/2012.

3. By a letter dated 17.05.2010, the petitioner along with 17 other officers, were granted financial up-gradation under Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme as indicated in the said letter. By the said letter, 2nd and 3rd MACP with effect from 01.09.2008 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4800/- and Rs. 5400/- in Pay Band of Rs. 9300-34800/- were sanctioned. A letter dated 21.02.2012 was issued in super session of the letter dated 17.05.2010 in respect of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top