SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 567

UJJAL BHUYAN
Manowara Begum (Mst. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S. Bharali and R. Doley, Advocates
For the Respondent:A.M. Bora, Advocate, R. Dhar, GA and R. Devi, CGC

JUDGMENT :

UJJAL BHUYAN, J.

1. Heard Mr. R. Doley, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. Dhar, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam for respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3. Also heard Ms. R. Devi, learned Central Government Counsel for respondent Nos. 4 to 7.

2. Petitioner in this case is Musstt. Manowara Begum.

3. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay adequate compensation to her for the killing of her son Md. Samir Khan by personnel belonging to Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and Assam Police. An alternative prayer has been made to handover investigation of the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation. Further prayer made is for monitoring of investigation of the case by this Court.

4. Case of the petitioner is that she is the mother of Md. Samir Khan. At the time of his death, he was aged about 22 years and was a college student. It is stated that Samir Khan was an innocent fun loving youth without having any criminal antecedent. He was a student of Arya Vidyapeeth College, Guwahati. Apart from Samir Khan, petitioner has three daughters.

5. On 01.11.2001 at about 11:30 p.m., petitioner's son Samir K

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top