SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 950

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
A.K. Goswami, Manish Choudhury, JJ.
Mrigen Borthakur - Appellant
Vs.
Union of India - Respondent
Writ Appeal No. 143 of 2019
Decided On : 28-08-2019

Advocates Appeared:
R. Dubey, Adv., V.L. Singh, Adv., T.C. Chutia, Adv., N. Bordoloi, Adv.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to consider all-round development, minimum displacement of people, and the impact on infrastructure and ecology in making decisions related to the construction of public infrastructure projects.

Headnote:

National Highway-37 - Dispute over construction route - NH Act, 1956, Section 3(1) - Land Acquisition Act, 2013, Section 3 - Master Plan - The court discussed the dispute over the construction route of National Highway-37, whether through Dergaon Town or a proposed bypass, and the implications of land acquisition. The judgment highlighted the consideration of cost benefit analysis, public interest, and the decision-making process involving the Master Plan and zoning regulations. The court emphasized the need for all-round development, minimum displacement of people, and the impact on infrastructure and ecology in reaching the decision to construct the highway through Dergaon Town.

Fact of the Case:

The dispute involved the construction route of National Highway-37, whether through Dergaon Town or a proposed bypass. The delay in project implementation due to public debate and litigation was noted, and the court directed the Chief Secretary to convene a meeting to resolve the issue and make a final decision within a specified timeframe.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the decision to construct the highway through Dergaon Town was based on considerations of all-round development, minimum displacement of people, and minimum adverse impact on individuals and infrastructure. The court dismissed the writ appeal, upholding the judgment & order of the learned Single Judge.

Issues: The main issue was the dispute over the construction route of National Highway-37, involving considerations of land acquisition, public interest, and adherence to the Master Plan and zoning regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the need for all-round development, minimum displacement of people, and the impact on infrastructure and ecology. The decision-making process involved the consideration of cost benefit analysis, public interest, and the decision to amend the Master Plan.

Final Decision: The writ appeal was dismissed, upholding the judgment & order dated 02.08.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.4319/2014.

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Goswami, J.

Heard Mr. R. Dubey, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. T.C. Chutia, learned State counsel, Mrs. V.L. Singh, learned standing counsel, National Highway & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) and Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned standing counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department.

2. Challenge in this writ appeal is to the judgment & order dated 02.08.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.4319/2014 dismissing the said writ petition. The writ petition was filed by 66 writ petitioners. The present appeal is preferred by 27 writ petitioners as appellants.

3. Subject matter in dispute, essentially, lies on the question as to whether the fourlane National Highway-37 should be constructed through Dergaon Town or whether the said Highway is to be constructed through a bypass, as was proposed in Dergaon Master Plan. The process for starting the construction of the National Highway was started sometimes in the year 2005-06 and till now the Highway has not seen the light of the day as construction of the bypass along the southern side of Dergaon Town could not be commenced and it remained a non-starter due to objections raised by cross-sections of the people. The bypass was to be constructed along the southern side of Dergaon Town from Km 426.810 and ending at Km 437.450. As per the Master Plan in force, if the bypass is constructed, for the length of 11.64 Kms, more than 600 Big has of land are required to be acquired. On the other hand, if the National Highway is taken through Dergaon Town, then only 23.34 Big has of patta land are required to be acquired.

4. In the affidavit of NHIDCL, it is stated that as per the original Project Report, it was proposed to construct the four-lane National Highway by expanding National Highway37 passing through Dergaon Town and the same was also accepted by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The same had to be changed subsequently in view of the zoning regulations of Dergaon Master Plan, which led to proposal being considered for constructing a bypass along the southern side of Dergaon Town.

5. The learned Single Judge at Paragraphs 19, 20 & 24 observed as follows:-

"19. What can be culled out from the deliberations as noted above is that initially the decision was to have the four-laning of the National Highway through Dergaon town by widening the existing NH-37. But after preparation of the Master Plan, it was decided to construct a bypass on the southern side of Dergaon town which would be in conformity with the Master Plan and the four-laning would be routed through the bypass. At that stage, it was not visualized that this proposal would run into serious resistance from the farmers as well as from organizations agitating for the rights of the farmers. The objections were so severe that no survey work could be carried out. Thereafter, meetings were held with various stakeholders wherein view expressed by the majority was that four-lane should be through Dergaon town by widening the existing NH-37. Various reasons have been given to support the said view including cost benefit analysis of the two proposals, one proposal being having four-laning through Dergaon town and the other being having four-laning along the southern bypass. After several rounds of discussions, it seems that the public as well as the authorities have veered around to the proposal to have the four-laning through Dergaon town. The authorities have also indicated that if necessary, Master Plan can be amended.

20. While this debate is going on, more than a decade has passed without any tangible work being undertaken for four-laning of the National Highway in Dergaon area. An infrastructural project of such importance has got bogged down in public debate and litigation because of which project has not seen the light of the day. This will inevitably lead to price escalation. Such delay in the implementation of a project of national importance is certainl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top