SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 952

KALYAN RAI SURANA
Uttam Kumar Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C. Kath Hazarika, Adv., P. Nayak, Adv., N. Goswami, Adv., S.S. Sharma, Adv., L. Sharma, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Kalyan Rai Surana, J.

Heard Mr. D.C. Kath Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Nayak, the learned Standing Counsel for the Finance Department i.e. respondents No.1 and 3, Mr. N. Goswami, the learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondent No.2 and Mr. S.S. Sharma, learned senior counsel assisted by Mrs. L. Sharma, the learned counsel for the private respondent No.4.

2. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the merit/select list dated 19.06.2012 and all consequential orders issued by the respondent No.2, i.e. the Deputy Commissioner, Bongaigaon-cum-Chairman, Selection Committee, thereby selecting and appointing the respondent No.4 in the post of Junior Accounts Assistant in the Bongaigaon Treasury.

3. The learned counsel by referring to the case projected in the writ petition has submitted that the Deputy Commissioner, Bongaigaon had invited applications for filling up two posts of Junior Accounts Assistant ('JAA' for short) and one post of Lower Division Assistant ('LDA' for

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top