KALYAN RAI SURANA
Uttam Kumar Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Kalyan Rai Surana, J.
Heard Mr. D.C. Kath Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Nayak, the learned Standing Counsel for the Finance Department i.e. respondents No.1 and 3, Mr. N. Goswami, the learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondent No.2 and Mr. S.S. Sharma, learned senior counsel assisted by Mrs. L. Sharma, the learned counsel for the private respondent No.4.
2. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the merit/select list dated 19.06.2012 and all consequential orders issued by the respondent No.2, i.e. the Deputy Commissioner, Bongaigaon-cum-Chairman, Selection Committee, thereby selecting and appointing the respondent No.4 in the post of Junior Accounts Assistant in the Bongaigaon Treasury.
3. The learned counsel by referring to the case projected in the writ petition has submitted that the Deputy Commissioner, Bongaigaon had invited applications for filling up two posts of Junior Accounts Assistant ('JAA' for short) and one post of Lower Division Assistant ('LDA' for
Board of Secondary Education Vs. Pravas Ranjan Panda
High Court of Tripura through the Registrar General Vs. Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee, (2019) Supreme 125
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Vs. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth
Pramod Kumar Srivastava Vs. Bihar Public Service Commission
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.