SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 988

MIR ALFAZ ALI
Amrit Kalita – Appellant
Versus
Rajani Kanta Kalita – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
A.D. Choudhury, S. Ali.

JUDGMENT :

Mir Alfaz Ali, J.

1. Heard Mr. A.D. Choudhury, learned counsel assisted by Mr. D. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner and Mr. A. Iqbal, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.

2. The petitioner herein, has filed a second appeal against the judgment and order passed in Misc. Appeal No. 18/2014 (corresponding to old Misc. Appeal No. 20/2012). As the said second appeal was filed beyond the period of limitation, the present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed praying for condonation of delay of 1293 days.

3. Explaining the delay, the petitioner stated in the petition that the respondent herein, as plaintiff filed a suit (Title Suit No. 272/2003) for specific performance of contract, which was decreed on 30.11.2004 and an execution proceeding being Title Execution Case No. 23/2005 was instituted for execution of the said decree. When the Nazir of the Court visited the suit land on 15.06.2007 in connection with the execution of the decree, the present petitioner came to know about the decree, wherein, the petitioner was not a party. However, the land in possession of the petitioner was included in the suit property. Therefore, the

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top