SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Gau) 1560

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, J.
Mafatlal Industries Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
State of Assam and Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) Nos. 1853 and 2744 of 2016
Decided On : 07-04-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. D. Das and Mr. H. Nath
For the Respondents: Mr. Y. Doloi and Mr. B. Gogoi.

Headnote:

Right to Information Act, 2005 – General Clauses Act, 1897 – Section 9 – Ceiling Amounts – Payment of – In WP(C) was filed by Director of Handloom & Textiles. – It is further stated that the Model Code of Conduct had come into effect – It is stated that steps were taken for getting fund through ceiling proposal for an amount of Rs. 28,53,02,818.50 so that payments can be made to the supplier. – Respondent No. 2 in WP(C) had filed an affidavit stating that it had not received any proposal from the Handloom, Textile & Sericulture Department for concurrence towards release of an amount of Rs. 28,47,29,028.50. – It is further stated that sanction order, which is annexed as Annexure 2 of the writ petition, was issued by the Handloom, Textile and Sericulture Department with the concurrence of the Finance Department with certain conditions. – No amount against the budget provision for procurement of yarn under Chief Ministers Special Programme for the year 2015-16 had been released and that the proposal moved by the Handloom, Textile and Sericulture Department for an amount of Rs. 28,53,02,818.50 was refused on the ground that Head of Account in the budget provision and fixation of ceiling proposal did not tally and that the supply order was not completed due to imposition of model Code of Conduct for Assam Legislative Assembly Election, 2016. – Accordingly, the Handloom, Textile and Sericulture Department was requested to re-submit the proposal with proper Head of Account and completion certificate and that no fixation of ceiling proposal had been received by the Finance (Budget) Department. – Held, It is on record that the steps were taken by the respondents for payment of an amount of Rs. 28,47,29,028.50 to the petitioner. – The said amount shall be paid within a period of 3 months. – The respondents are also directed to receive the balance quantity of yam. – However, as the yam is lying in different godowns and as some yam had also been sent back to the factory at Gujarat, petitioner is directed to file a representation before the Additional Chief Secretary to the Government of Assam, Handloom, Textiles and Sericulture Department along with a copy of this order for a fresh delivery schedule and within a period of 3 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation, the Additional Chief Secretary to the Government of Assam, Handloom, Textiles and Sericulture Department will inform the petitioner the fresh delivery schedule. – It goes without saying that before acceptance of the materials, the respondents will be at liberty to inspect the yam sent for delivery. – Writ Petitions Disposed of

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. D. Das, learned senior counsel for the petitioners in both the writ petitions. Also heard Mr. Y. Doloi, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam, appearing for all the respondents in WP(C) No. 1853/2016 and respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 29 in WP(C) No. 2744/2016 and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned counsel, Finance Department, appearing for the respondent No. 2 in WP(C) No. 2744/2016.

2. The subject-matter of the two writ petitions arise more or less out of the same issue and accordingly, the same had been listed together for consideration. As agreed to by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the two writ petitions are taken up for disposal at the admission stage and by this common judgment and order, the same are being disposed of.

3. The common thread running through both the writ petitions, inter alia, is that the petitioner, which is a public limited company, is one of the largest composite Textile Mills in the country and its main business includes production, manufacturing and supply of yard-dyed-shirting, voiles, prints, linen, bleached white fabrics, rubia, value added and fashion denims, bottom weights, corduroys, school uniforms, corporate/institution uniforms, yams and ready-mades. The petitioner Company is equipped with world class technology manufacturing units at Navsari and Nadiad and it has the capacity to produce various kinds of premium fabrics.

4. The Director of Handloom & Textiles, respondent No. 2 in WP(C) No. 1853/2016, who is respondent No. 3 in WP(C) No. 2744/2016, vide e-tender dated 7.12.2015, had invited bids from registered manufacturers or their authorised dealers for the purpose of supply of 2/60s Mercerized Bleached Cotton Hank Yam and 2/60s Mercerized Dyed Cotton Hank Yam (Colour fast to sunlight and washing) to the weavers under Chief Minister's Special Programme for the year 2015-16 in 6 categories, namely, A, B, C, D, E, and F. Group A of e-tender was in respect of supply of 2/60s Mercerized Bleached Cotton Hank Yam and 2/60s Mercerized Dyed Cotton Hank Yam (Colour fast to sunlight and washing) for the districts of Tinsukia, Dibrugarh, Sivasagar and Golaghat, Group B for the districts of Jorhat, Nagaon and Morigaon, Group C for the districts of Dhemaji, Lakhimpur, Sonitpur and Udalguri, Group D for the districts of Kamrup, Kamrup (M), Nalbari and Barpeta, Group E for the districts of Bongaigaon, Dhubri, Goalpara, Kokrajhar, Chirang and Baksa, Group F for the districts of Cachar, Hailakandi, Karimganj, Dima Hasao and Karbi Anglong. The last date of submission of tender was 28.12.2015 up to 12:00 Noon and opening of the bid was also fixed on the very same day at 1:00 p.m.

5. The petitioner-company participated in respect of Groups C, D, E and F. The tender was designed on two-bid system, namely, Technical Bid (Part I) and Price Bid (Part II). After evaluation of the tender documents by the respondent-authorities, the petitioner-company was found to be successful in all the Groups that it had participated and accordingly, the Director of Handloom & Textiles issued work order dated 20.1.2016 in respect of the aforesaid Groups mentioning the quantity and the rate, which is the rate quoted by the petitioner. By the said order, the petitioner was requested to make necessary arrangement of supply of the materials within 45 days from the date of issue of the supply order. Pursuant to the aforesaid work order dated 20.1.2016, an agreement was entered into by and between the authorised representative of the petitioner-company and the Director of Handloom & Textiles on that very day. It is stated that production work was started immediately and goods were despatched by trucks on different dates and that the last despatch was made on 29.2.2016.60% of the despatched goods were received and acknowledged at the destination points of different Districts/Sub-Divisions of the State of Assam. The remaining 40% of the despatched goods had also reached the destination points for delivery on 4.3.2016

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top