SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Gau) 94

RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Md Najirul Islam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. L R Mazumder, for the Appellant; PP, Assam, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This is second pre-arrest bail application by the petitioner Najirul Islam, whereby he has sought for pre-arrest bail in connection with Uluoni P.S. Case No.115/2019 (corresponding to G.R. Case No.870/2019), under Sections 376 of the IPC, read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act , on the ground that by this time, the investigation might have completed and release of the accused may be considered.

2. Heard learned counsel for both sides and perused the record.

3. The offence relates to minor girl who is s student of Class-X and the case is registered u/s.4 of the POCSO Act along with Section 376 of the IPC.

4. For the purpose of consideration of pre-arrest bail, a prima facie case is to be considered as to whether the same is made out from the materials on record.

5. This Court on the last occasion, on 11.12.2019 has already gone through the case diary and finding prima facie evidence against the petitioner with such serious offence, pre-arrest bail prayer was rejected. The ground that has been taken by the petitioner cannot be a new ground to re-visit the earlier findings.

That being so, the present petition which has no merit, is hereby dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top