GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J.
National Plywood Industries Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India - Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1059 of 2020
Decided On : 17-02-2020
Moratorium - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Section 14 (1) - [Section 14 (1) of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016] - The court discussed the implications of the moratorium declared by the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 14 (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and its prohibition on the institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor, including the execution of any judgment, decree, or order in any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel, or other authority.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged an order requiring payment and imposing a penalty, citing a moratorium declared by the National Company Law Tribunal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Commissioner had not examined whether the pending proceeding before the GST authorities was covered by the moratorium declared by the National Company Law Tribunal.
Issues: The main issue was whether the order of moratorium of the National Company Law Tribunal covered the proceeding pending before the GST authorities under the GST Act 2017.
Ratio Decidendi: The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need to examine whether the order of moratorium also covered the proceeding pending before the GST authorities.
Final Decision: The order dated 15.11.2019 was set aside, and the matter was remanded back for a fresh consideration within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the court's order.
JUDGMENT
Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J. - Heard Mr. M Kataki, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. SC Keyal, learned ASGI appearing for the Union of India.
2. The order dated 15.11.2019 of the Commissioner, GST, Dibrugarh is assailed in this writ petition. By the said order, a requirement for payment of Rs.1,82,67,651/- on the petitioner M/S National Plywood Industries Limited was confirmed and further a penalty of Rs.1,82,67,581/- was imposed under Rule 173Q (1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The said order dated 15.11.2019 has been assailed by stating that the petitioner has been held to be a corporate debtor as per the order dated 26.08.2019 of the National Company Law Tribunal, Guwahati and accordingly an order of moratorium had been passed under Section 13 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
3. Mr. SC Keyal, learned ASGI refers to the paragraph 3.2 of the order of the Commissioner dated 15.11.2019 which is extracted as under:.
wxyz
"3.2 I find that the Hon''ble National Company Law Tribunal, Guwahati Bench had passed the order dated 26.08.2019 in respect of the bankruptcy case of the assessee wherein they are liable to certain debt to the financial creditor and their properties are also controlled for the debt including any action under Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. By virtue of the order dated 26.08.2019, the Hon''ble National Company Law Tribunal has declared a Moratorium under the insolvency & bankruptcy code-2016 in terms of Section 14 of the said code vide which proceedings against the corporate debtor including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority was prohibited. Now, the question arises whether adjudication of Show cause notices would mean an execution order or be treated as decree against them. I find that adjudication means determination of liability against any assessee to whom show cause notices have been served and in the instant case also there is no bar of the tax authority to carry out the exercise of adjudication process for determining the liability of the assessee towards the department."
zyxw
4. By relying on the view taken by the Commissioner, Mr. Keyal submits that the said objection raised by the petitioner as regards the order of moratorium passed by the National Company Law Tribunal had been taken care of by the Commissioner in its order.
5. We have perused the order of the Commissioner in paragraph 3.2 of the order dated 15.11.2019. The Commissioner takes a view that by the order dated 26.08.2019, the National Company Law Tribunal has declared a moratorium under Section 14 (Section 13) of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the corporate debtor in respect of execution of any judgment and decree or order of any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority. Accordingly, in the order of the Commissioner a question was raised whether issuance of show cause notice by the GST authorities would mean to be an execution of an order or it be treated as decree against the petitioner. By raising such question, the objection that the further proceeding is not maintainable because of the order of moratorium of the National Company Law Tribunal was overruled.
6. Section 14 (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is as follows:
wxyz
"14. Moratorium- (1) Subject to provisions of sub-sections (2) and (3), on the insolvency commencement date, the Adjudicating Authority shall by order declare moratorium for prohibiting all of the following, namely:-
zyxw
wxyz
(a) the institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority;
zyxw
wxyz
(b) transferring, encumbering, alienating or disposing off by the corporate debtor any of its assets or any legal right or beneficial in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.