SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Gau) 419

PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Kalen Danggen – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N. Danggen, Advocate, T. Jini, Advocate, A. Saring, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Parthivjyoti Saikia, J - Heard Ms. N. Danggen, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Ms. T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Arunachal Pradesh, for the State respondent No. 1 and Mr. A. Saring, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.

2. This is an appeal filed under Section 372 of the Cr.P.C., against the acquittal order dated 15.12.2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pasighat, in Psg. Session Case No. 272/12, under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. For appreciation of the appeal, the prosecution case against the respondents may be stated first.

4. On 02.05.2012, 6 (six) persons, namely, Sri Kalen Danggen, Sri Dogan Taron, Sri Kanggong Komboh, Sri Adum Taron, Sri Anggo Komboh and Sri Kalom Komboh, have jointly filed an F.I.R. before the Officer-InCharge of Yingkiong Police Station alleging that the respondent No. 2 had burnt down a house on 24.02.2012.

5. On conclusion of the investigation, Police filed a Charge-Sheet against the present respondent No. 2, Smti Mum Peyang, under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code.

6. During the trial, the prosecution has examined asmany as 11 (eleven) numbers of witnesses and finally, the Tri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top