PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA, HITESH KUMAR SARMA
Jai Kishan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hitesh Kumar Sarma, J.
1. These two appears have been preferred under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 against the order, dated 14.11.2019, passed by the learned Special Judge, Yupia in Case No. RC-03/2019/NIA/GUW under Sections 302/307/34 of the IPC read with Sections 25(1b)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 10/13/16/17/18 and 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as UAP Act).
2. The aforesaid Case No. RC-03/2019/NIA/GUW arose out of Khonsa PS Case No. 28/2019 under Sections 302/307/34 of the IPC read with Sections 25(1b)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 10/13/16/17/18 and 20 of the UAP Act.
3. The fact leading to the case is that, the informant C.T. Nokliam Tekwa, lodged the FIR before the officer-in-charge, Khonsa Police Station informing inter-alia that while a convoy of Tirong Aboh, M.L.A. was crossing Pansumthong Village area, the convoy was suddenly ambushed and attacked by suspected armed undergrounds. In the said incident Tirong Aboh and 10 others were killed. On the basis of the said FIR, Khonsa Police Station Case No. 28/2019 was registered under Sections 302/307/34 of the IPC read with Se
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.