SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Gau) 1234

NANI TAGIA
Ekar Riba – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :D. Panging, Advocate
For the Respondents:T.T. Tara, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Nani Tagia, J.

1. Heard Mr. D. Panging, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. T.T. Tara, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. On a complaint lodged by the respondents against the petitioners vide complaint dated 01.04.2016 before the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Basar with regard to the Pagi-II Village and Hide river, the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Basar by an order dated 06.04.2016 issued under Memo No. BSR/LK-176/15-16/Vol-III/, constituted a Bango Level Keba with as many as 23 GBs/Head GBs in connection with the land and Hide river dispute case between the petitioners and the respondents. The petitioners, however, by a letter dated 13.04.2015, expressed their non willingness to discuss the Pagi-II land and Hide river ownership dispute in local Bango Level Keba.

3. The additional Deputy Commissioner by a letter dated 19.04.2016 vide memo No. BSR/LK-176/15-16/VOL-III issued another order stated to be in continuation of the earlier order dated 06.04.2016 and constituted Bango Level Keba, re-fixing the case to be heard on 26.04.2016 by the 21 GBs/Head GBs named therein. Although, the petitioners did not participate in the Bango Level Keba held on 26.04.2016,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top