SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 166

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J.
Sharbari Ray - Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam And Ors - Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 8834 of 2018
Decided On : 16-03-2021

Advocates Appeared:
M. Dev, Advocate, J. Roy, Advocate, A.R. Tahbildar, Advocate, R. Borpujari, Advocate

Legal representation is a crucial aspect of the court proceedings.

Headnote:

Counsel - Petitioner - Legal representation

Fact of the Case:

The court heard from the petitioner's counsel and the respondents' counsels.

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the arguments presented by the counsels and reached a conclusion.

Issues: Legal representation

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the arguments presented by the counsels.

Final Decision: The court made a decision based on the analysis of the counsels' arguments.

JUDGMENT

Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J. - Heard Mr. J. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 2 and 4 and Mr. R. Borpujari, learned counsel for the respondent No.3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top