SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 95

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Gajen Ch Swargiary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.J. Ghosh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J. - Heard Mr. BJ Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R Mazumdar, learned counsel for the Secondary Education Department of the Government of Assam, Mr. B Choudhury, learned counsel for the authorities under the BTC and Mr. R Islam, learned counsel for the respondent No.7.

2. The facts in brief are that the writ petitioner Sri Gajen Chandra Swargiary was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the Chinakona High School on a graduate scale of pay on 01.10.1998. The respondent No.7 Sri Jiten Chandra Kalita on the other hand was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the Chinakona ME School and he received his graduate scale of pay from 04.06.1992. The Chinakona ME School was amalgamated with the Chinakona High School as per the order of amalgamation dated 03.04.2017. We further take note that the respondent No.7 Sri Jiten Chandra Kalita was also the Headmaster of Chinakona ME School at the time when the school was amalgamated. As per the terms of amalgamation, the Headmaster of the ME School becomes Assistant Headmaster of the amalgamated High School after such amalgamation. Admittedly, after the amalgamation of the ME School and the High Scho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top