SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 123

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Mohit Ali Anad Anr – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. Bujarbaruah, Advocate, N.J. Khataniar, Advocate, R.B. Bora, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J. - Heard Ms. A. Bujor Barua, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. R.B. Bora, learned counsel for the BTC, Mr. N.J. Khataniar, learned counsel for the Elementary Education Department of the Govt. of Assam.

2. The petitioner No.1 Md. Mohit Ali was appointed as Science teacher of Naoshali Anusuchita M.E. School in the Mushalpur Block, Baksa district of Assam. The school concerned was provincialised under the Assam Venture Educational Institutions (Provincialisation of Services) Act, 2011 (in short Act of 2011). But in doing so, the petitioner No.1 was left out from the process. In the circumstance, this petition is instituted for a direction that the service of the petitioner No.1 be also provincialised. The statement showing the particulars of 13 Science Teachers in the Upper Primary Schools under the Baksa district contains the name of the petitioner Md. Mohit Ali showing his date of appointment to be 09.08.2008. No materials have been produced before the Court that by operation of law the service of the petitioner No.1 stood provincialised under Section 4(1) of the Act of 2011.

3. In the circumstance, the entitlement of the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top