SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 120

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Pranita Sarma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I. Alam, Advocate, R. Mazumder, Advocate, S.K. Goswami, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J. - Heard Mr. S.K. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. I. Alam, learned counsel for the NCTE, Mr. R. Mazumder, learned counsel for the Secondary Education Department.

2. The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Science in the Gitanagar High School, Guwahati in the year 1995 and the school was provincialised in the year 1991. The petitioner passed out her M.A. examination in English in the year 2011 from Gauhati University and also obtained B.Ed degree from the Gauhati University in the year 1996. The petitioner had undertaken her B.Ed course from the institute namely Dakhin Guwahati B.Ed college. The petitioner is aggrieved by a communication dated 27.07.2020 of the Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam in the Secondary Education Department addressed to the Director of Secondary Education, Assam by which it was provided that as per the view of the Judicial Department, the B.Ed degree of the petitioner has no validity.

3. The respondents in the Secondary Education Department seek to justify such view taken on the ground that the institute Dakhin Guwahati B.Ed college from which the petitioner had obta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top