SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 247

SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Raju Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N. Khataniar, Advocate, N. Dhar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Soumitra Saikia, J. - Heard Mr. N. Dhar, learned counsel for the review petitioners. Also heard Mr. N. Khataniar, learned Standing counsel, Education (Elementary) Department, Government of Assam appearing for respondents.

2. This review petition is directed against the common judgment and order dated 04-09- 2020 rendered in WP(C)/8068/2019 and other connected writ petitions whereby WP(C)/8068/2019, WP(C)/5572/2017, WP(C)7174/2017 & WP(C)/7387/2017 were taken up together for hearing and disposal.

3. The skeletal facts necessary in addressing the issues raised in the present review petition are that by an advertisement dated 12-02-2014 issued by the Mission Director, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan (SSA), Assam applications were invited for recruitment on contractual basis to the posts of Assistant Teachers in Lower Primary School across eight (8) districts of Assam. The applications of the petitioners were rejected by the Respondent Authorities as they did not secure 50% marks in their Higher Secondary examination as per the Recruitment Rules. The petitioners being aggrieved, challenged the rejection before this Court by filing WP(C)/6879/2014. The grievances of the petitioners were that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top