SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 254

SUMAN SHYAM, MIR ALFAZ ALI
Amrit Ballav Goswami – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Z. Kamar, Advocate, D.K. Das, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Suman Shyam, J. - Heard Mr. Z. Kamar, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N.M. Hazarika, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. We have also heard Mr. D. K. Das, leanred senior counsel assisted by Ms. P.K. Darjee, learned counsel and Mr. Vishal Diwedi, learned Public Prosecutor, NIA, for the respondent.

2. This appeal has been preferred under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 assailing the order dated 29/08/2020 passed by the learned Special Judge, NIA Court, Assam, Guwahati, in connection with Misc. Case (NIA) 13/2020, rejecting the bail application filed by the appellant.

3. The facts of the case, in a nutshell, are these :-

(i) On 15/05/2019, Sri Mukut Chandra Deka, S.I, Geetanagar Police Station had lodged an ejahar with the Officer-in-Charge, Geetanagar P.S. informing that on 15/05/2019, when the Police personals from the Geetanagar Police Station was conducting a search operation in front of the Central Mall, R.G. Baruah Road, at about 7-40 p.m., some unknown miscreants threw a grenade on the police party and managed to escape from the scene. Due to the grenade blast, the persons mentioned in the ejahar had received simple and grievous i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top