SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 209

SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Ram Sevak Kurmi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.B. Choudhury, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar Medhi, J. - Considering the subject matter in dispute and also in view of the fact that pleadings have been exchanged, the present writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. I have heard Ms. SB Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. I have also heard Ms. MD Bora, learned Standing Counsel, Transport Department, Assam as well as Ms. B Bora, learned counsel for the Accountant General, respondent no.7. Ms. M Devi, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent no. 8.

3. The subject matter of challenge in this writ petition is an order dated 17.02.2020 by which, the private respondent no. 8 has been promoted to the post of Head Assistant. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was appointed as a Lower Division Assistant (LDA) in the Inland Water Transport Department vide an order dated 23.12.1986 and subsequently promoted to the rank of UDA (Senior Assistant) on 04.04.2008 and his name was against Sl. No.4. By the said order, the respondent no. 8 was also promoted to the rank of UDA and was placed in Sl. No.2. It is the case of the petitioner that while he had joined as Senior Assistant on 16.04.2008, the respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top