SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 193

NANI TAGIA
Nitin Goba – Appellant
Versus
State Of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C. Modi, Advocate, I. Riram, Advocate, P. Sangeeta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Nani Tagia, J. - Heard Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned Govt. Advocate representing all the respondents.

2. This writ petition has been directed against the Office Memorandum dated 27.10.2017, issued by the Assistant Inspector General of Police (E), PHQ, Headquarter, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh vide No.PHQ/Admn/163/2014, by which order, the petitioner's date of birth has been recorded as 30.12.1959.

3. Assailing the aforesaid impugned O.M. dated 27.10.2017, the petitioner contends that he was appointed as a Constable in the Arunachal Pradesh Police on 19.04.1979. At the time of his appointment, the petitioner had submitted a School Leaving Certificate dated 28.01.1979 from Harmati Govt. Aided High School, P.O. Harmati, North Lakhimpur, (Annexure-II to the writ petition) in support of his age, wherein the age of the petitioner was shown to be 17 years 6 months on the date of leaving the school i.e., on 30.06.1978. On the basis of the certificate submitted by the petitioner, the respondent authorities in the service book of the petitioner entered the date of birth of the petitioner as 30.12.1959, and age on enrolment as 18 years 3 mon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top