IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Manish Choudhury, J.
Padmeswar Konch, F/o Late Manuj Konch - Appellant
Versus
Assam Power Distribution Company Ltd (apdcl) And Others - Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1921 of 2018
Decided On : 03-02-2021
Electrocution - Compensation - Electricity Act, 2003, Section 161 - The court discussed the provisions of Section 161 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which requires notice of any accident resulting in loss of human life to be given to the Electrical Inspector, and the duty of the Electrical Inspector to enquire into the cause of the accident affecting public safety. The court highlighted the findings of the Electrical Accident Enquiry Report, which established that the death was caused by sudden flow of high voltage electricity due to faults in the electrical system, and the lack of protective devices and maintenance. The court emphasized the principle of strict liability and the responsibility of the APDCL authorities for the accident.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition concerned the death of a victim due to electrocution, caused by faults in the electrical system of the respondent APDCL authorities. The petitioner, father of the deceased, sought compensation for the loss suffered by the family. The court heard submissions from both parties and considered the Electrical Accident Enquiry Report and relevant provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the death of the victim was caused by the sudden flow of high voltage electricity due to faults in the electrical system, as established by the Electrical Accident Enquiry Report. The court rejected the respondent APDCL authorities' contention that the victim's negligence caused the accident, emphasizing the principle of strict liability. The court also noted the inordinate delay by the authorities in disbursing compensation, and directed the respondent APDCL authorities to pay compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/- along with 12% interest per annum to the petitioner.
Issues: The issues involved the cause of the victim's death, the liability of the APDCL authorities, and the delay in disbursing compensation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the findings of the Electrical Accident Enquiry Report, the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the principle of strict liability. The court emphasized the responsibility of the APDCL authorities for the accident and the need for prompt disbursal of compensation.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondent APDCL authorities to pay compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/- along with 12% interest per annum to the petitioner, and allowed the petitioner to pursue further compensation through private law remedy.
JUDGMENT
Manish Choudhury, J. - The subject-matter in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is the death of the victim, Late Manuj Konch claimed to have occurred in an accident due to electrocution and a direction has been sought to the respondent APDCL authorities to grant adequate compensation for such death.
2. The relevant background facts, in brief, leading to the institution of the writ petition are as follows : the petitioner is the father of one Manuj Konch. The family of the petitioner resides in Village Soru Ajoha, Post Office Kolakata, Police Station Dhemaji, District Dhemaji, Assam. It is projected that on 18.09.2016, the son of the petitioner was taking bath near the tube-well located inside the premises of their residence. Due to sudden carriage of high voltage of electricity in the electrical lines, caused by a damaged transformer, in the locality under Dhamaji Electrical Sub-Division, APDCL, Manuj Konch received shock due to electrocution. Though Monuj Konch was taken to the nearby health facility, Bengenagarah CHC immediately, but the Medical Officer, NHRM at Bengenagarah CHC vide Cadaver Slip declared that the victim was brought dead to the Centre. An application reporting the death vide death report was duly submitted and the Registrar of Birth and Death, Bengenagarah CHC, District Dhemaji had issued a death certificate recording the death of Late Monuj Konch on 18.09.2016 vide Death Certificate dated 01.10.2016. In connection with the said death of the victim, a First Information Report (FIR) was made before the In-charge, Machkhowa Out Post under Dhemaji Police Station by the petitioner on 09.10.2016 and the same was recorded as Machkhowa Out Post General Diary Entry No. 149 dated 10.10.2016.
2.1. The deceased was aged about 22 years of age and he was the elder son of the petitioner. The deceased was a Graduate in Arts and after passing is B.A. examination in the year 2015, he took admission in M.A. Course in Sociology in Dibrugarh University in the year 2016.
2.2. It is the case of the petitioner that when despite the fact that the death of the deceased was caused due to electrocution for faults attributable on the part of the respondent APDCL authorities, no compensation had been paid. The petitioner approached the respondent no. 1 by filing a representation on 17.02.2017 seeking adequate compensation for the loss suffered by the family due to the death of Monuj Konch. As no response was received from the respondent APDCL authorities with regard to the said representation, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition seeking the relief, stated above.
3. Heard Mr. K.R. Patgiri, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, APDCL for respondent nos. 1-3 and Mr. G. Pegu, learned Junior Government Advocate for respondent nos. 4-6.
4. Projecting as above, it is submitted by Mr. Patgiri that the electrical accident was caused due to fault on the part of the respondent APDCL authorities and there was no negligence on the part of the victim. Referring to the Electrical Accident Enquiry Report submitted by the respondent no. 6, he has submitted that it has been established that the death was due to carriage of sudden and abrupt high voltage of electricity in the electrical line of the motor connected to the tube-well, which was unexpected. The deceased was simply taking bath near the tube-well located inside his house premises. He has further submitted that despite occurrence of the event of death in the year 2016, the respondent APDCL authorities were lackadaisical in their approach and have not provided due compensation to the family of the victim. He has submitted that the matters regarding high voltage of electricity in the locality and the death of the petitioner s son were brought to the notice of the Deputy Commissioner, Dhemaji by the local public. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhemaji caused an enquiry and i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.