SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 232

MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Vanlalruati Pachuau – Appellant
Versus
Lallawmsanga Ralte – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.H. Lianhrima, Advocate, Ruth Lalruatfeli, Advocate, T. Lalnunsiama, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Michael Zothankhuma, J. - Heard Mr. L.H. Lianhrima, the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. T. Lalnunsiama, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. This appeal had been filed by the appellant/ plaintiff against dismissal of Civil Suit No. 35/2009 vide Judgment and Order dated 09.03.2015, passed by the Court of the Civil Judge, Aizawl.

3. The case of the appellant/plaintiff is that as the appellant was in need of money, she approached the respondent for a loan of Rs. 12 lakhs in the month of December, 2008. The respondent agreed to give the loan and stated that the loan agreement would be in the form of an oral agreement. However, a Sale Deed would have to be made for the appellant?s land and building covered by LSC No. AZL. 91 of 1974, which would be used as collateral security for repayment of the loan. The further case of the appellant is that the respondent assured the appellant that the Sale Deed would only be used to secure the loan amount and that the Sale Deed would be cancelled once the loan amount was repaid. Accordingly, on 10.12.2008, Sale Deed was executed between the parties and the respondent handed over a sum of Rs. 15 lakhs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top