IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Kalyan Rai Surana, Mir Alfaz Ali, JJ.
Luthfa Begum Laskar - Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam And Others - Respondent
Writ Appeal No. 200 of 2020
Decided On : 22-01-2021
Panchayat Act - No Confidence Motion - Section 15 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 - The court discussed the procedural requirements of section 15(i) of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 and its interpretation in the context of a no-confidence motion against the President of a Gaon Panchayat. The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the term 'lost' within the meaning of section 15(i) and its implications on the bar in bringing no-confidence motion against the President within six months.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, an elected President of a Gaon Panchayat, challenged a resolution for her removal on the ground of irregularities and violation of section 15 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the resolution was null and void, and the no-confidence motion was 'lost', leading to the consequence that no further no-confidence motion could be brought within six months.
Issues: The issues revolved around the procedural irregularities and the interpretation of section 15(i) of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 in the context of the no-confidence motion.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the term 'lost' within the meaning of section 15(i) and its implications on the bar in bringing no-confidence motion against the President within six months.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed as not maintainable based on the discussions and the court's findings.
JUDGMENT
K.R. Surana, J. - Heard Dr. B. Ahmed, the learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. RKD Choudhury, learned Addl. Senior Govt. advocate for respondent no.2, Mr. M. Nath, learned standing counsel for the P&RD Department for respondent nos. 1, 4, 5 and 6 and Mr. PN Goswami, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 9 to 17. None appears on call for respondent nos. 3, 7 and 8.
2. Bereft of details, it would be sufficient for the purpose of this order to narrate the brief facts of the case of the appellants in W.A. 200/2020. The appellant was the elected President of 9 No. Sonabarighat Gaon Panchayat. The respondent nos. 9 to 17, who are the members of the said Gaon Panchayat had moved a motion of no confidence against the appellant. By a resolution dated 21.08.2020 for removal of the appellant as President of the said Gaon Panchayat was taken in the meeting of the said Gaon Panchayat. The aggrieved appellant moved this Court by filing W.P.(C) No. 3411/2020 to challenge the said resolution, amongst others, on the ground that it is vitiated by irregularities and was in violation of the requirements of section 15 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 by projecting that under section 15(i) of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 the President was entitled to at least 15 (fifteen) days time to give approval for a meeting of no confidence against her, but even before expiry of the said period, the Secretary of the 9 No. Sonabarighat Gaon Panchayat had moved the President of Sonai Anchalik Panchayat under second paragraph of section 15(i) of the said 1994 Act. As per order dated 08.09.2020, the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 9 to 17 had made a statement that there is a possibility that the procedural requirement of section 15(i) may not have been followed and upon instructions, the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 9 to 17 had prayer to allow him to withdraw the resolution dated 21.08.2020 by which the appellant had been removed from the post of 9 No. Sonabarighat Gaon Panchayat, which having not been objected to, was allowed by this Court by the impugned order dated 08.09.2020, declaring the resolution dated 21.08.2020 to be null and void. It was also provided that as the resolution has not been defeated, but it is a case where it has not been pressed upon by the respondents, resulting in its withdrawal, view was expressed by the learned Judge of this Court that the respondent nos. 9 to 17 are entitled to proceed in any manner as they may be advised under the law.
3. The appellant had filed an application for review of the order dated 08.09.2020 and the learned Single Judge by order dated 15.10.2020 passed in Review Pet No. 91/2020 "4. when there is a declaration that the resultant resolution passed in such motion is null and void, it has to be understood that the motion was lost. When the motion was lost, the consequence of the other relevant provisions of law including that there cannot be a further no confidence motion again within a period of 6 (six) months would also be applicable."
4. The aforesaid order dated 08.09.2020 was challenged by the respondent nos. 9 to 17 by filing an intra-Court appeal, which was registered as W.A. No. 152/2020 and the coordinate Division Bench of this Court by judgment and order dated 24.11.2020, allowed the said writ appeal and set aside the order dated 15.10.2020 passed in Review Pet. No. 91/2020 by clarifying that since the resolution dated 21.08.2020 passed the no- confidence motion cannot be said to have been "lost" within the meaning of section 15(i) of the Act, the bar in bringing no- confidence motion against the President within six months thereof will not apply.
5. The appellant has now filed this intra-Court appeal against the order dated 08.09.2020, passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 3411/2020, thereby allowing the respondent nos. 9 to 17 to withdraw the resolution dated 21.08.2020 by which the appellant was ousted from the office of the President of 9 No. Sonabarighat Gao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.