SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Gau) 649

N.KOTISWAR SINGH, MANISH CHOUDHURY
Shristi Deka – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N. Choudhury, Advocate, J. Patowary, Advocate, B. Gogoi, Advocate, D.K. Baidya, Advocate, P. Deka, Advocate

JUDGMENT

N. Kotiswar Singh, A.C.J. - Heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. J. Patowary, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel Health Department; Mr. D. K. Baidya, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 5 and Mr. P. Deka, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 6.

2. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant, namely, Ms. Shristi Deka, who was the writ petitioner No. 2 in WP(C) No. 6949/2018, being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 09.08.2019 passed in the aforesaid writ petition, by which it was held that the petitioner Nos. 2 to 5 in the writ petition were not entitled for any relief sought as the admission of the respondent Nos. 6 to 17 therein in WP(C) No. 6949/2018 for the MBBS Course had not been found to be illegal.

3. Without going in detail on the facts and submissions advanced in the writ petition and herein, it would suffice for the purpose for deciding this writ appeal to mention only a few relevant facts.

4. The petitioner No. 2 in the said writ petition [WP(C) No. 6949/2018], had participated in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test, 2018- Under Graduate (NEET-UG,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top