SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Gau) 659

S.HUKATO SWU
Northeast Frontier Railways – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nuksungtila, Advocate, V. Suokhrie, Advocate, P.B. Paul, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S. Hukato Swu, J. - The present appeal under Rule 29 of the Rules for Administration of Justice and Police in Nagaland read with Article 227 of the Constitution is filed by the Northeast Frontier Railways represented by its General Manager and the Divisional Railway Manager, Northeast Frontier Railway, Lumding, Assam challenging the impugned order No.LD-1/2001-D/1/11126 dated 17-08-2012 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Dimapur, Nagaland wherein, the State of Nagaland represented by the Chief Secretary, Nagaland, Kohima, the Commissioner, Nagaland, Kohima, the Deputy Commissioner, Nagaland, Dimapur, Nagaland and Shri. Lhoutuo Loucu are arrayed as the opposite parties while M/S Loktak, H.E. Project represented by the Chif Engineer, Loktak Down Stream, H.E. Project Vidyut Vihar, P.O., Loktak, Kom Keirap-795124, Manipur has been arrayed as proforma opposite party.

2. Facts of the case is that the Northeast Frontier Railways was allotted a plot of land measuring 135.502 acres in Naga Hill, under Dimapur Mouza for Railway plan land etween Rangapahar crossingKhatkhati and was in possession of the said land since independence period. The allotted land was traced out as plan DEN/LM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top