SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Gau) 628

NELSON SAILO
P. Lalnunthara – Appellant
Versus
State Of Mizoram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R. Malhotra, Advocate, Mary L Khiangte, Advocate, J.C. Lalnunsanga, Advocate, L.H. Lianhrima, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Nelson Sailo, J. - This order will dispose of both the writ petitions as they involve similar and identical issues. There are 4 (four) petitioners in WP(C) No. 96/2017 while there is only 1 (one) petitioner in WP(C) No. 90/2018. As for the respondents, they are one and the same in both the cases.

2. Heard Mr. A.R Malhotra, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Ms. Mary L. Khiangte, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Also heard Mr. J.C Lalnunsanga, learned Standing Counsel, Mizoram Public Service Commission (MPSC) appearing for respondent No. 5 and Mr. L.H Lianhrima, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Ruth Lalruatfeli, for the respondent No. 7.

3. The case of the writ petitioners in brief is that on the recommendation of the MPSC, they were appointed to the post of Asst. Engineer/Sub-Divisional Officer (AE/SDO) in the Minor Irrigation Department (Irrigation Department), Government of Mizoram in order of merit and with effect from the date of their joining service. The post of AE/SDO is classified as General State Service, Group "A" Gazetted and Non-ministerial. The State Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top