SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 89

NANI TAGIA
BENGIA SAGUNG S/O SHRI BENGIA TANGAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. O F AP, ITANAGAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Nalo Pada Advocate
For the Respondent: GA (AP) B Picha

ORDER :

Heard Mr. N. Pada, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

In view of the submission made by Mr. I. Riram, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate; Mr. Pada, learned counsel for the petitioner, is hereby directed to furnish the requisite extra copies of the writ petition during the course of the day.

List it after 6 weeks.

In the meantime, Mr. Riram, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State Respondents, and Mr. B. Picha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of private Respondents No. 7, 8 & 9, shall file their respective counter affidavits.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top