SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Gau) 742

MANOJIT BHUYAN, PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Nur Begum – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Md. A. Matlib, Advocate
For the Respondents: Asstt. S.G.I.

ORDER :

Manojit Bhuyan, J.

1. Heard Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, learned senior counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. G. Hazarika, learned counsel representing respondent No. 1. Also heard Ms. B. Das, learned counsel represents respondent No. 2; Mr. A. Kalita, learned counsel represents respondent Nos. 3, 5 and 6 and Ms. U. Das, learned counsel for respondent No. 4.

2. Petitioner assails opinion dated 24.01.2019 passed by the Foreigners 'Tribunal Jorhat, Assam in Case No. FTG(D) 100/2007, declaring her to be a foreigner as per section 2(1)(a) of the Foreigners' Act, 1946.

3. For the purpose of discharging burden as required under section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 to prove that petitioner is not a foreigner, she exhibited as many as 8 (eight) documents, the particulars of which may be noticed as under:

    (i) Exhibit-1 - School Certificate issued by the Headmaster of Dooria Bagicha High School, P.O.-Dooria, Golaghat, certifying that the petitioner is the daughter of Raju Hussain, inhabitant of Khonikar Bosti who left the school on 31.12.2000 when she was reading in Class-IX and her date of birth is 01.01.1986.

(ii) Exhibit-2 - Certificate dated 31.08.2014 issued by the Government Gaonburah

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top