NANI TAGIA
Mirpe Tato – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
Nani Tagia, J.
1. Heard Mr. T.T. Tara, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Govt. Advocate representing the State respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
II. A writ in the nature of Certiorari should not be issued quashing and setting aside the impugned subsequent order(s) being Memo No. PERS-56/93 (Pt-II)/310 dated 09.11.2018 and Memo No. PERS-56/93 (Pt-II)/724, dated 1.11.2019, whereby the suspension period of the petitioner was kept on extending after expiry of every six months and also the impugned order being Memo No. PERS-56/93/586, dated 3.6.2020 iss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.