SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 477

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
Babita Deka W/o Sri Makund A. Deka – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A. Deka.

JUDGMENT :

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, J.

1. Heard Mr. A. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Smt. Chisti, learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 3 being the authorities under the Secondary Education Department of the Government of Assam and Ms. D.D. Barman, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 being the Personnel (B) Department, Government of Assam.

2. The petitioner, who otherwise claims to be qualified in all other aspect for being appointed to the post of Post Graduate Teacher in Economics in any Higher Secondary School and who is also belongs to the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) Category has raised a grievance that the upper age limit in respect of the advertisement dated 08.09.2021 of the Director of Secondary Education, Assam prescribes for an upper age limit of 38 years in respect of the General Category candidates. The petitioner by virtue of belonging to the EWS category would also have to be construed in law to be a candidate belonging to the General category and therefore, the upper age limit of 38 years would be applicable for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner refers to an Office Memorandum No. ABP/6/2016/51 dated 02.09.2020 of the Principal Secret

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top