IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
NANI TAGIA, J.
Nabab Ali Sk, S/o Late Abdul Jabbar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam, represented by the Public Prosecutor, Assam – Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition No.260 of 2018
Decided on : 18-11-2021
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498(A)/34 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Sections 319, 397 r/w Section 401 - Criminal Conspiracy – Cruelty – Dowry Demand - Power to proceed against other persons appearing to be guilty of offence – Revision - Whether learned trial Court in its impugned order was justified in issuing summons to petitioners in exercise of power under Section 319(4) of Cr.P.C for trial of petitioners along with accused under Sections 498(A)/34 of IPC solely on basis of deposition of P.W-9, victim/informant in her examination-in-chief - Petitioners herein as well as against her husband, alleging of dowry demand and the cruelty meted out to her by accused persons named therein, for failure to fulfil their dowry demand - Respondent No.2 was married to accused No.1, as per Muslim Shariat at time of marriage, a Pulsar Bike, steel and wooden furnitures, golden ornaments and also other essential articles were given to him as dowry - When she failed to pay amount, accused person, with a view to miscarriage her pregnancy forcefully administered a tablet(medicine) upon her against will. Thereafter accused person assaulted and drove her out of the house. Finding no alternative she came to her mother’s house.
Finding of the Court :
Section 319 Cr.P.C is an enabling provision empowering the Court to take appropriate steps for proceeding against any person(s) not being an accused at any stage during the trial i.e., before the conclusion of trial to summon such person to face the trial in the ongoing case, once trial Court finds that there is some evidence against such a person on the basis of which evidence, it can be gathered that such a person(s) appears to be guilty of he offence. The evidence herein has been held to mean, material that is brought before the Court during the trial including such evidence that has surfaced in examination-in-chief without cross-examination of the witnesses - It appears that the learned trial Court had issued summons to the petitioners in exercise of power conferred under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C on the basis of categorical deposition made by P.W-9 against petitioners stating to be constituting an offence punishable under Sections 498(A)/34 of the IPC – Court not find any error in impugned order passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate issuing summons to the petitioners under Section 319(4) of Cr.P.C for trial of petitioners along with the accused for an offence punishable under Sections 498(A)/34 of IPC solely on the basis of the deposition made by P.W-9/victim/informant.
Result: Criminal Revision petition fails
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. A. T. Sarkar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1.
None has appeared for the respondent No.2, though the notice on respondent No.2 was duly served.
2. This is a Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 readwith Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, challenging the order dated 13.06.2018, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhubri in G.R. Case No.5139/2015, arising out of Dhubri P.S. Case No.1399/2015, under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, whereby summons have been issued to the petitioners in exercise of power under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C.
3. The facts leading to filing of the instant Criminal Revision Petition, briefly stated, are as follows:
The respondent No.2 had filed an FIR dated 05.11.2015, before the Officer-in-Charge, Dhubri Police Station against the petitioners herein as well as against her husband, Shahnawaz Hassan (Rubul), alleging of dowry demand and the cruelty meted out to her by the accused persons named therein, for failure to fulfil their dowry demand. In the FIR filed, it was stated that on 13.10.2014, the respondent No.2 was married to the accused No.1, Shahnawaz Hassan (Rubul) as per Muslim Shariat and by executing Kabin Nama. At the time of marriage, a Pulsar Bike, steel and wooden furnitures, golden ornaments and also other essential articles were given to him as dowry. However, after few days of marriage, her husband, Shahnawaz Hassan@Rubul, instigated by the other family members demanded Rs.2,00,000/-as dowry and started to torture her mentally and physically. She, however, continued the conjugal life tolerating all the atrocities committed on her and in due course of time, she became pregnant. Thereafter also, the accused persons again demanded Rs.2,00,000/-as dowry. When she failed to pay the aforesaid amount, the accused person, with a view to miscarriage her pregnancy on 15.10.2015, at around 10.00 PM forcefully administered a tablet(medicine) upon her against the will. Thereafter, on 25.10.2015, at around 2.00 PM, the accused person assaulted and drove her out of the house. Finding no alternative she came to her mother’s house.
4. On the basis of the aforesaid FIR, Dhubri P.S. Case No.1399/2015 was registered on 05.11.2015, under Sections 120(B)/498(A)/313/307/325/506 of the IPC. On completion of the investigation, charge-sheet dated 29.02.2016 was filed before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhubri against the husband of the respondent No.2, namely, Shahnawaz Hassan@Rubul under Section 498(A) of the IPC. The remaining accused persons, however, was not charge-sheeted. The Investigating Officer has tendered as many as 12(twelve) witnesses including the victim/respondent No.2, in support of the case of the prosecution. After the cognizance of the offence was taken by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhubri, the statement of as many as 9(nine) prosecution witnesses have been recorded.
5. P.W-9 is the respondent No.2/victim/informant, whose statement was recorded on 13.06.2018, annexed as Annexure-3 series to the Revision petition. The deposition of the P.W-9 recorded, are in the following manner, which is reproduced hereinbelow:
My name is Mislana Mahfuz daughter of Mofizur Rahaman Sarkar wife of Sahanaz Hassan residing at Chagolchara Part-3, Police Station-Dhubri, DistrictDhubri, where I am a student of Six Semester B.A
On oath
I am the informant of this case. Ext-1 is the ejahar lodged by me and Ext-1(1) is my signature. I lodged ejahar against my husband named Sahahnaz Hassan other six family members of my husband. On-13/10/2014, my marriage was solemnized with the accused named Sahanaz Hassan by executing Kabinnama and I started
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.