IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
HITESH KUMAR SARMA, J.
Miss Rejina Begum D/o Late Raju Ali – Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India and Others – Respondents
W.P. (Crl.) No. 15 of 2021
Decided On : 11-11-2021
Constitution of India - Article 226 - Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988- Section 67(c) – Detention order - Daughter of the detenu/petitioner has assailed the order of detention - Unexplained inordinate delay in disposal of the representation.
Finding of the court:
Unexplained delay in disposal of the representation would have a fatal bearing on the detention of the detenu - respondent No. 1 has not responded to the representation of the petitioner even after 83 days (on the date of hearing) and communication rejecting the representation by the respondent No. 2 was received by the petitioner on 25.09.2021 and as such, i.e., after 59 days of receipt of the representation by the respondent No. 2 although the rejection order was passed on 06.09.2021, i.e., after 39 days - Personal liberty protected under Article 21 is so sacrosanct and so high in the scale of constitutional values that it is the obligation of the detaining authority to show that the impugned detention meticulously accords with the procedure established by law. The power of preventive detention must therefore, be confined to very narrow limits otherwise the great right to liberty will become nugatory.
Result: Allowed
JUDGMENT :
HITESH KUMAR SARMA, J.
1. Heard Mr. Y.S. Mannan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Baruah, learned Central Government, Standing Counsel, appearing for respondent No. 1, Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 5 and 7 as well as Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, NCB appearing for respondent No. 6.
2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the daughter of the detenu/petitioner has assailed the order of detention dated 16.07.2021 in respect of the detenu, issued by the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Home and Political Department (respondent No. 3), which was passed in exercise of power under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (herein after referred to as “PIT NDPS Act” for short).
3. The detenu was detained on 19.07.2021 as she had appeared in the Bharalumukh Police Station in compliance to a notice, dated 17.07.2021 issued by the respondent No. 6, vide Annexure-3, under Section 67(c) of the NDPS Act (as amended), 1985 and was supplied with the grounds of detention issued by the respondent No. 3, dated 16.07.2021.
4. The relevant part of the detention order reads as follows:
1. Latasil PS Case No. 124/2016 U/S 21(C)/28 NDPS Act, 1985.
2. Bharalumukh PS Case No. 366/2020 U/S 21(b)/27A/29 NDPS Act, 1985.
3. Panbazar PS Case No. 656/2020 U/S 22(b)/25/27/27(a)/29 NDPS Act, 1985.
4. Bharalumukh PS Case No. 435/2021 U/S 22(b) NDPS Act.
Whereas it also appears from the police report that during investigation the seized particulars suspected to be heroin in respect of Latasil PS Case No. 124/2016 U/S 21(C)/28 NDPS Act, 1985 and Bharalumukh PS Case No. 366/2020 U/S 21(b)/27A/29 NDPS Act, 1985 were sent to FSL for examination and FSL report gave positive result for narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.”
5. Vide the said detention order, the detaining authority, i.e. the respondent No. 3 directed the respondent No. 5 to serve the detention order upon the detenu which was accordingly served. Thereafter, as directed by the respondent No. 3, vide letter dated 16.07.2021 (Annexure-2) the grounds for detention was communicated to the detenu by letter dated 19.07.2021 vide Annexure-4 (the date of receipt of the detention order is 19.07.2021 as mentioned in Annexure-4 itself). In the grounds of detention, it has been mentioned that four cases under the NDPS Act have been registered against the detenu being:
2. Bharalumukh PS Case No. 366/2020 U/S 21(b)/27A/29 NDPS Act, 1985.
3. Panbazar PS Case No. 656/2020 U/S 22(b)/25/27/27(a)/29 NDPS Act, 1985.
4. Bharalumukh PS Case No. 435/2021 U/S 22(b) NDPS Act.
6. Other specific grounds mentioned in the detention order are quoted below:
5. Your above illegal activities have clearly established the fact that you have involved yourself with the crime of illegal trade of narcotic drugs. You have been operating the illegal narcotic drugs trade as a mastermind in several districts including Kamrup (M) which involves several drug peddlers including minors, School and college going students are being used by you to supply narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in schools and colleges. This is ruining health, future and demographic dividend of s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.