SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Gau) 795

M.R.PATHAK
Goverdhan Prasad Atal – Appellant
Versus
Assam Gramin Vikash Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : J.C. Gaur
For the Respondents: K. Malakar

ORDER :

M.R. Pathak, J.

1. Heard Mr. J.C. Gaur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Banerjee, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner herein is a businessman and owner of immovable property measuring 04 Katha - 0.375 Lecha under Dag No. 3420 covered by Patta No. 407 at Revenue Village Seuni Ali, Ward No. 19, Mouza - Jorhat Town Mouza No. 2, District - Jorhat, Assam, bounded by - North: land of Ashok Agarwala and Manoj Agarwala, South: A.T. Road and land of the petitioner, East: land of Bidyut Das and others and West: land of Jogmaya Hazarika and sons (hereinafter referred to as said land).

3. The petitioner decided to develop his said land and after obtaining necessary permission, he started construction of a multi storied RCC building, having 45 individual residential units/flats with financial assistance of the State Bank of India. It is contended that as the respondent Assam Gramin Vikash Bank offered more loans and also offered to take over the loans of SBI, therefore, the petitioner agreed with the terms of the respondent Bank. Initially, an amount of Rs. 235.74 lakhs was sanctioned by the respondent Bank to the petitioner as term loan and later it was enh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top