SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 110

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, SOUMITRA SAIKIA, JJ.
Smti. Hiron Kalita, Wife of Late Parbananda Kalita – Appellant
Versus
Smti. Sabita Kalita, W/o-Late Parbananda Kalita – Respondent
W.A No.284 of 2021
Decided on : 17-02-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. B. Deka, Advocate
For the Respondents:Ms. S.G. Baruah, Mr. S. Sharma, Advocate

Point of Law : In the absence of any sanction in law, such action by a public authority like APDCL cannot be accepted to be legally valid.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 31(1) - Assam (Services) Pension Rules, 1969 - Rule 143 - Employed as a Driver - Family pension - Appellant claimed to be first legally wedded wife of Late - Deceased employee, at relevant point in time, was employed as a Driver in erstwhile "Assam State Electricity Board" (ASEB) now known as "Assam Power Distribution Company Limited" - Retired from service He received his pension - Subsequently, he expired After expiry , appellant and respondent No. 1 (petitioner in writ petition) approached the APDCL Authorities, each staking their claims for family pension as legally wedded wife.

Finding of the Court:

There is no reference made to order dated issued by APDCL authorities, where it is provided that upon death of pensioner family pension would be payable to appellant - No reference to any Rules/Regulations or circulars etc. is brought on record or even referred to during course of hearing by APDCL authorities to support its impugned order as well as order dated, wherein the name of appellant was shown as nominee to receive family pension after death of pensioner - Court are not persuaded to interfere with impugned order dated passed by learned Single Judge in W.P(C) No.

Result: Writ appeal dismissed

JUDGMENT :

Soumitra Saikia, J.

This writ appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 22.02.2021 passed in W.P(C) No. 533/2018 by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition filed by the respondent No. 1 in the present appeal was allowed and the impugned Orders dated 14.09.2017 and 16.12.2017 passed by the respondents/Authorities, whereby the appellant was held to be entitled to receive family pension of Late Parbananda Kalita, were set aside and quashed. Being aggrieved the present appeal has been filed.

2. The appellant claimed to be the first legally wedded wife of Late Parbananda Kalita. Deceased employee, at the relevant point in time, was employed as a Driver in the erstwhile “Assam State Electricity Board” (ASEB) now known as “Assam Power Distribution Company Limited” (hereinafter referred as “APDCL”). Late Parbananda Kalita retired from service on 31.05.2012. He received his pension on 03.05.2013. Subsequently, however, he expired on 02.07.2016. After the expiry of Late Kalita, the appellant namely, Smti Hiron Kalita and the respondent No. 1 (petitioner in the writ petition) namely, Smti. Sabita Kalita approached the APDCL Authorities, each staking their claims for family pension as the legally wedded wife of Late Parbananda Kalita. The APDCL by communication dated 18.01.2017 and 20.03.2017 informed both the appellant as well as the respondent No. 1 to appear before the Authorities and submit documents in support of their claims for receiving the family pension as the wife of Late Parbananda Kalita. It may be stated herein that during the entire service tenure Late Parbananda Kalita did not nominate either the appellant or the respondent No. 1 as a nominee to receive the family pension and other service benefits in the event of his death. However, pursuant to his retirement, the appellant nominated the appellant as the person entitled to receive family pension in the event of his death. The APDCL Authorities by order dated 03.05.2013, while sanctioning the pensionary benefits to Late Parbananda Kalita on his superannuation on 31.05.2012 mentioned the name of the appellant as the person entitled to receive the pensionary benefit upon the death of Late Parbananda Kalita.

3. The writ petitioner (respondent No. 1 herein) in support of her contention that she is the first wife of Late Parbananda Kalita, relied upon the Death Certificate issued on 11.07.2016 by the Competent Authority, wherein she was shown as the wife of the deceased Late Parbananda Kalita, who expired on 02.07.2016. She has also referred to the deposition of Late Parbananda Kalita in M.R. Case No. 08/1997, which case was filed by the respondent No. 1/petitioner under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance from Late Parbananda Kalita. The said case was filed as some differences arose between the respondent No. 1 and the deceased employee after their marriage and pursuant to which they had been living separately. However, they were not divorced. The fact that she is the legal wife of Late Parbananada Kalita is evident from the deposition of the deceased himself before the Court. The deceased on oath had deposed before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pathsala at Barpeta in the said M.R. Case No. 08/1997 that the respondent No. 1/writ petitioner was his first wife.

4. That apart, on the basis of the depositions made therein that the respondent No. 1/petitioner was the first wife of Late Parbananda Kalita, by Judgment dated 26.05.1998 passed in M.R. Case No. 811/1997 under Section 125 Cr.P.C., the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bajali, Pathsala directed that a maintenance amount of Rs. 300/-(Rupees three hundred) only per month and Rs. 100/-(Rupees one hundred) only per month for their daughter, Smti Dipanita Kalita be paid until further orders. Family identity card enclosed to the writ petition is also relied upon by the petitioner to show that the cardholder’s name was reflected as Late Parbananda Kalita and his family comprises of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top